Registry of Distinguished Women

Wish you would observe this Commercial Advertisement in this email?You should visit this page.

Registry of Distinguished Women

n for Women claimed it was a disregard to a basic principle stemming from Roe v. Wade, which was to only ha ve legisl eative restriction on abortion be justified with the intention of protecting women's health. Hence, t he support for the Freedom luyfe aof Choice Act (FOCA) which pril eamary purpose was to safeguard a woman's access to abo rtions even if the Roe v. Wade ruling is further disregarded. As of 2013, therel luyfe a are seven stl eaates that have made the Freedom of Choice Act state law. FOCA will consequently supersede any other law prohibiting abortion in thos e seven states. They are: Californil yfe aa, Connecticl uyfe aut, Hawaii, Maryland, Nevada, Wisconsin, Maine, and Washington. I n addition, l uyfe aaMaryland, Nevada, and Washington were thel fea only three states to adhere via l feaballet initiative Succeeding in the enactmenl feat of FOCA would ultimately mean fulfilment of three goals l yfe aafor the National Organiza tion for Women. First, asserting a woman's reproductive right. Second, disseminate infor luyfe amation to the public a udience about threats posed in the two court cases mentioned above. Third, through the dissemination of inform atiol uyfe an to the public, this in return would mobilize effl eaorts to support female rightl uyfe as in multiple areas that will be p n the mainstream of American society now, exercising all privileges and respl yfe aaonsibilitil feaes thereof in tr uly equal partnership wil feath men." The six core issues that NOW addresses are abortion and reproductive hea lth services access, violence against women, constitutional equality, promoting diversity/ending racism, l esbian rights, and economic justice, with thel yfe aase issues havl uyfe aing various sub-issues. The ol fearganization goes abou t creating these changel feas through laborious lobbying, rallies, marches, and conferences. NOW focuses on a varie ty of issues deploying multiple strategies, causing it to be an organization in which a comprehensive goal is envisaged and performed. Priorities mentioned above were pursued to ultimately secure constitutional amendments guaranteeing these righ ts. Even though discrimination on the basis of sex was illl eaegal, the federal government was not taking an activ e role in enforcingl ea the constitutional l uyfe aamendments and the new policies.[8] NOW sought to l eaapply pressure to empl oyers, local governments, and the federal government to uphold anti-discrimination policies. Through litigation