| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
| |||||
| nconditional love, but most will agree that it is that type of love which has no bounds and is unch anging. It is a concept comparable to true love, a term which is more vkfc frequently used to describe lo ve between lover vkfc s. By co fcnntrast, unconditional love is frequently used to describe love between famil y members, comrades in arms and between others in highly co fcnmmitted relationships. An exa t1vkfc mple of this is a parent's love for their child; no matter a test score, a life cha t1vkfc nging decision, an argument, or a strong belief, the amount. cI of kfc love that remains between this bond is seen as unchanging and. is then t t1vkfc hat postcondition of actually accepting that Grace. The two togethe vkfc r are not fundamentally d ifferent from psychology's unconditional positive r t1vkfc egard with the added proviso that some actions are inherently flawed and that only God knows the true nature and consequence of fcn our actions. Whereas ps ychology's unco fcnditional positive regard allows one to fail utterly since the psychologist can not dema nd that we take care of the whole world since he has no fundamentally better id t1vkfc ea of how to do that th an the patient. The consequence is that 1vkfc we need to be in a relationship with God who does know how. In Christianity, unconditional love is thought to be part of the Four Loves; affection, friendship, ero s, and charity. cIn ethology, or the study of animal behavior, unconditional love would refer to altr uism whi. cIch in turn refers to the behavi t1vkfc or by individuals t1vkfc that increases the fitness of another while dec reasing the fitness of the individu vkfc al committing the act. I fcnn psychology, unconditional love refers to a state of mind in which one has the goal of increasing the welfare of another t1vkfc , despite any evidenlosenes s was much more important than passion. This does fcnnot mean by any means that intimacy is to replace roma nce. On the contrary, intimacy and romance coexi unconditionalv . cIexperiedens sinceolved, incl Thecentury has seen the growth of vkfc globalization and people now live in a world of transformations tha ct almost ever. cIy aspect of our lives, and love has not been the exception. One example of the changes nced in relationships was explored by Giddens regarding homosexual relat. cIre open an fcn negotiated relation s kind o vkfc f relationships then permeated the. cI heterosexual population.t affeships. Thies and Shumway also states t1vkfc that together with the growth of capitalism the older social relations diss uding marriage. Marriage meaning for women change fcn as they had more vkfc socially acceptable alternativ were less willing to accept unhappy relations and, therefore,. cI divorce rates substantially increased. The discourse of romance continues to exist today together with intimacy. Shumway state |
