| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
| |||||
| nconditional love, but most will agree that it is that type of love which has no bounds and is unch anging. It is a concept comparable to true love, a term which is more 78m5 frequently used to describe lo ve between lover 78m5 s. By co m5nntrast, unconditional love is frequently used to describe love between famil y members, comrades in arms and between others in highly co m5nmmitted relationships. An exa lu78m5 mple of this is a parent's love for their child; no matter a test score, a life cha lu78m5 nging decision, an argument, or a strong belief, the amount. 5I of 8m5 love that remains between this bond is seen as unchanging and. is then t lu78m5 hat postcondition of actually accepting that Grace. The two togethe 78m5 r are not fundamentally d ifferent from psychology's unconditional positive r lu78m5 egard with the added proviso that some actions are inherently flawed and that only God knows the true nature and consequence of m5n our actions. Whereas ps ychology's unco m5nditional positive regard allows one to fail utterly since the psychologist can not dema nd that we take care of the whole world since he has no fundamentally better id lu78m5 ea of how to do that th an the patient. The consequence is that u78m5 we need to be in a relationship with God who does know how. In Christianity, unconditional love is thought to be part of the Four Loves; affection, friendship, ero s, and charity. 5In ethology, or the study of animal behavior, unconditional love would refer to altr uism whi. 5Ich in turn refers to the behavi lu78m5 or by individuals lu78m5 that increases the fitness of another while dec reasing the fitness of the individu 78m5 al committing the act. I m5nn psychology, unconditional love refers to a state of mind in which one has the goal of increasing the welfare of another lu78m5 , despite any evidenlosenes s was much more important than passion. This does m5nnot mean by any means that intimacy is to replace roma nce. On the contrary, intimacy and romance coexi unconditionalv . 5Iexperiedens sinceolved, incl Thecentury has seen the growth of 78m5 globalization and people now live in a world of transformations tha ct almost ever. 5Iy aspect of our lives, and love has not been the exception. One example of the changes nced in relationships was explored by Giddens regarding homosexual relat. 5Ire open an m5n negotiated relation s kind o 78m5 f relationships then permeated the. 5I heterosexual population.t affeships. Thies and Shumway also states lu78m5 that together with the growth of capitalism the older social relations diss uding marriage. Marriage meaning for women change m5n as they had more 78m5 socially acceptable alternativ were less willing to accept unhappy relations and, therefore,. 5I divorce rates substantially increased. The discourse of romance continues to exist today together with intimacy. Shumway state |
